Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Values for 30 × 30 × 30 mm PP and GFPP cubes autoclaved at 134 °C. PP cubes withstood one and two rounds of autoclaving at this temperature. GFPP cubes displayed a larger variance because some cubes melted after two rounds of autoclaving, but others survived one and three rounds. Numbers in parentheses denote a negative calculated value

From: Reusability of autoclaved 3D printed polypropylene compared to a glass filled polypropylene composite

Polymer

Number of Autoclaves Completed

Average Initial Mass (g)

Average Percent Mass Loss

Average Percent Volume Loss

Category

PP (n = 5)

1

14.46 ± 0.19

0.04 % ± 0.008 %

0.33 % ± 0.34 %

1

PP (n = 10)

2

14.63 ± 0.20

0.01 % ± 0.007 %

0.87 % ± 0.58 %

1

PP (n = 5)

3

14.53 ± 0.06

0.06 % ± 0.016 %

1.70 % ± 1.81 %

2

GFPP

(n = 5)

1

16.16 ± 0.23

(0.01)% ± 0.008 %

0.43 % ± 0.37 %

1

GFPP

(n = 10)

2

16.06 ± 0.16

0.06 % ± 0.38 %

4.04 % ± 4.27 %

3

GFPP

(n = 5)

3

15.91 ± 0.11

(0.03)% ± 0.03 %

0.60 % ± 0.46 %

1